Re: [exim-dev] Bug: No warning or default for missing retry …

Góra strony
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Autor: Philip Hazel
Data:  
Dla: Jochen Topf
CC: exim-dev, Graeme Fowler
Temat: Re: [exim-dev] Bug: No warning or default for missing retry section
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Jochen Topf wrote:

> > Perhaps the docs need to be amended to state categorically that:
> >
> > Removal (or omission) of the retry section, or inclusion of the section
> > with no rules, results in there being no retry attempts on any sort of
> > error condition. All errors will, therefore, immediately be treated as
> > permanent.
>
> That would be the least we can do.


As I and an OP pointed out, it does already say that, but I will make it
say it more loudly. I will also write a warning into the default
configuration.

People's expectations obviously differ. Mine is "no retry config => no
retry"; other people perhaps expect things to be different. But I don't
want to make an exception for retries. After all, "no routers => no
routing", "no authenticators => no authentication", and "no rewrite
rules => no rewriting", so why should retrying be different?

Exim has been the way it is for over 10 years; if only two people have
been confused, I'm not too worried. :-)

-- 
Philip Hazel            University of Cambridge Computing Service
Get the Exim 4 book:    http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book