On Wednesday 06 June 2007 18:35, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 09:28 -0700, snowcrash+exim-users wrote:
> > and has been replaced by the release of DKIM (http://www.dkim.org/),
> > using a correspoinding 'libdkim'.
>
> Isn't libdkim under the Apache-2 licence and hence also not
> GPL-compatible?
libdkim is released under the Apache license, version 2.0, which the FSF
believes not to be compatible with the GPL, version 2, but the copyright
notice for Exim says:
"In addition, for the avoidance of any doubt, permission is granted to
link this program with OpenSSL or any other library package and to
(re)distribute the binaries produced as the result of such linking."
--
Magnus Holmgren holmgren@???
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
