Hi,
may I ask why the userforward router in the exim default configure
file has the "no_verify" option set? Ths prevents the use of ":fail:"
in a ~/.forward file (at least it causes accept-and-bounce behavior),
and I do not see any advantage here.
The only difference that comes to my mind is that an error in a
~/.forward file with no_verify causes the message to sit in the local
queue while it would not be accepted (and queued remotely) if
no_verify were unset.
I must be missing something here.
Greetings
Marc
--
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834
