著者: Peter Bowyer 日付: To: exim users 題目: Re: [exim] Converting SRS to Normal
On 22/04/07, Marc Perkel <marc@???> wrote: >
>
> Peter Bowyer wrote:
> On 22/04/07, Marc Perkel <marc@???> wrote:
> I'm looking for the REAL sender. The sender the way it originally went
> out before pobox.com changed it. I want the ORIGINAL sender.
> As I said, no dice. pobox.com is the sender. Since they've
> taken responsibility for the message by putting their domain in > the envelope, it's their message you're receiving. Any relationship with > a previous sender is their business.
This is, of course, a good thing - > because they're also saying that if you have a problem with the message you > can go to them with it.
You can't have it both ways.....
Peter
>
> You can keep saying that
Indeed I can, because it's right.
> by in this case pobox is the forwarder who is
> changing the sender to themselves by mangling the headers.
No, they've 'mangled' the envelope sender, which is what SRS requires
them to do.
> My definition of
> the sender is the ORIGINAL sender. I want to know, for example, if it was a
> yahoo message. If so, and it's spam, I'm going to deliver it to
> abuse@???. But when pobox.com mangles the headers with SRS then I
> can't report yahoo's spam because the message doesn't apprear to come from
> yahoo.
No, you've got it wrong - you should report it to pobox.com, because
they've accepted responsibility for the message. That is precisely
what the fact that they use SRS means - they're acting as a
responsible forwarder. This is *good*.
If it needs reporting to yahoo.com, the people to do that are
pobox.com. They are able to determine the original sender.
