jean-paul natola wrote:
*snip*
>>> THEN test the acl_m19 (or whatever) value before invoking scanning.> >
>
> it definatley triggered the fact that it was over one meg- but it still was
> scanned;
>
Having *set* the value / flag, did you not then test it to see what was to be
done/not?
Bill
>
> X-Spam-Flag: NOX-Oversize: Message too large to scan.X-Spam-Score: -98.1
> (---------------------------------------------------)X-Spam-Report: Spam
> detection software, running on the system "milter.fci", has identified this
> incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to
> this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If
> you have any questions, see The administrator of that system for details.
> Content preview: Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- 2 GB of storage and
> industry-leading spam and email virus protection. [...] Content analysis
> details: (-98.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name
> description ---- ----------------------
> -------------------------------------------------- 0.6 NO_REAL_NAME
> From: does not include a real name -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address
> is in the user's white-list 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message
> has _________________________________________________________________ Connect
> to the next generation of MSN Messenger
> http://imagine-msn.com/messenger/launch80/default.aspx?locale=en-us&source=wlmailtagline
