Re: [exim] $header_* not defined in router?

On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 07:06:50PM +0100, Graeme Fowler wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 18:51 +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > No it should not. "def" takes a variable name (including header_*:); the
> > dollar sign would cause $header_To: to be expanded and whatever it contains
> > to be used as the variable to check.
>
> Oops. Only half-reading the question is, evidently, a bad idea. It's
> been a long day :)
>
> Carlo: what does a debug run give you? There will be more than simply
> "condition test failed".

The rest is not relevant. The fact that the condition fails
indicates that the header_ is not defined -- which is rediculous.

I'd REALLY like to know how I can test a $header_to: in a router
definition! Anyone?

--
Carlo Wood <carlo@???>

PS I sent to full output to Graeme in private anyway.