On Thursday 29 March 2007 23:27, Marc Perkel wrote:
> If a domain has a policy of signsall=1 and there is no signature - is
> that good enough to reject the email?
That's up to you if you think that every domain that declares that policy
actually follows it. Maybe the probability is greater than for domains with
SPF records ending in "-all".
> If a message is signed but result is badsig - can I reject it?
That's up to you, but it's not generally recommended, I believe, as the chance
is too great that some relay alters the message in a way that breaks the
signature.
--
Magnus Holmgren holmgren@???
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
"Exim is better at being younger, whereas sendmail is better for
Scrabble (50 point bonus for clearing your rack)" -- Dave Evans
