Re: [exim] Who is APEWS.ORG

Dean Brooks wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 07:35:26AM -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
>
>> The thing is with Exim sender verify is extremely light and it works
>> really well when done correctly. And Exim - thanks Phil - does it
>> correctly, and then some. I welcome sender verification calls myself
>> because it keeps spammers from wanting to use domains that I host as
>> fake from addresses which greatly reduces the load on my servers. Sender
>> Address verifiction works.
>>
>
> Not everyone in the world thinks SAV on public-facing interfaces is a
> good idea, myself included. Just because you think it's a good idea
> doesn't mean everyone agrees with you.
>
> Now, please, this exact same issue was beat to death a couple of months
> ago. I see no reason to go through the same issue all over again.
>
>

The issus isn't if SAV is a good idea or not. The issue is about lists
that claim to be spam blacklists listing non spammers who use SAV. If
you don't like SAV then don't use it. But I choose to use it.