Peter Bowyer wrote:
> On 29/03/07, Ian Eiloart <iane@???> wrote:
>
>> Perhaps. I've not checked, but I don't recall any discussion of RBLs
>> listing (or claiming to list) servers *because* they do sender address
>> verification callouts. I'm grateful to Marc for alerting us to this. I also
>> think its interesting to find out something about the RBL, and the people
>> behind it (including what disinformation is out there).
>>
>
> As Marc mentioned, uceprotect definitely do that - he's had a spat
> with them before which was discussed on this list.
>
> http://www.uceprotect.net/en/index.php?m=10&s=13
>
> They also think that SRS is abusive - the logic behind that escapes me.
>
> Peter
>
>
I'm no fan of SRS but I certainly don't consider it abusive. What I
consider to be busive is adding people to spam block lists who are
actually in the spam filtering business.
