Author: Peter Bowyer Date: To: exim users Subject: Re: [exim] Who is APEWS.ORG
On 29/03/07, Ian Eiloart <iane@???> wrote: > Actually, the only thing 'Perkel specific' here is the objections that are
> being raised. Had anyone else started this thread, I don't believe those
> objections would have been raised.
>
> It's certainly not unusual to discuss the merits of implementing certain
> features that Exim provides. Indeed, it's quite common for people to reply
> "you should not do that" in response to a "how to question".
True, but the merits or otherwise of sender callbacks are a path
well-trodden - a bit like the SPF example that Nigel quotes in the
list info on the wiki.
