Hi,
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 02:30:06PM +0100, Philip Hazel wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, jaco engelbrecht wrote:
>
> > Surely the result should just be "0", not "0\n0"? What am I doing
> > wrong?
> >
> > My condition in my exim configure file:
> >
> > 2004 condition = ${if and {\
> > 2005 { or
> > { { !eq {$header_X-Trend:}{clean} }\
> > 2006
> > { !eq {$header_X-ClamAV:}{clean} }\
> > 2007 }\
> > 2008 }\
> > 2009 {< {${sg
> > {$header_X-Spammark:}{\N(\d+)\.(\d+)\N}{\$1}}}
> > {$ACL_SPAMMARK_THRESH} } \
> > 2010 {match{$
> > {extract{1}{\:}{$ACL_SPAMMARK_FLAGS}}}{vINS}}\
> > 2011 }\
> > 2012 }
>
> That has been horribly screwed up in the posting somehow. What are those
> numbers? Can you post the condition exactly as it appears in your file?
> What is the definition of ACL_SPAMMARK_THRESH? What release of Exim are
> you using?
(Those were the line naumbers in vim, sorry. Let me reply using mutt instead...)
condition = ${if and {\
{ or { { !eq {$header_X-Trend:}{clean} }\
{ !eq {$header_X-ClamAV:}{clean} }\
}\
}\
{< {${sg{$header_X-Spammark:}{\N(\d+)\.(\d+)\N}{\$1}}} {$ACL_SPAMMARK_THRESH} } \
{match{${extract{1}{\:}{$ACL_SPAMMARK_FLAGS}}}{vINS}}\
}\
}
ACL_SPAMMARK_THRESH is the users' spam thresold (e.g. 96).
${sg{$header_X-Spammark:}{\N(\d+)\.(\d+)\N}{\$1}} should return e.g. if given 100.00 => 100, 0.00 => 0, etc.
The X-Spammark header is added by a local_scan plugin. What I noticed in the last hour or so is that bounce messages do not have the X-Spammark header present, so that's another problem that I need to solve. In my original problem I reported, the debug shows the X-Spammark header was present though, and had a value of 0.00, so it's two unrelated problems.
For the second problem, what's the best way to check for the existance of the X-Spammark header, and setting it to 0 if it's not present?
I'm currently trying:
{< {${sg{${if def:h_X-Spammark:{$h_X-Spammark:}{0.00}}}{\N(\d+)\.(\d+)\N}{\$1}}} {$ACL_SPAMMARK_THRESH} } \
Jaco
--
bje@???
