On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, Daniel Richard G. wrote:
> So, you're saying that the line in question should be written simply as
>
> 0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00, /* 88-95 */
>
> and the other affected ones similarly?
Yes. I think there are just two lines, aren't there? The first should be
0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00, /* 88- 95 */
and the second
0x00,0x00,0x00,0x80,0x80,0x80,0x00,0x00, /* 88- 95 */
Not many people are familiar with EBCDIC code. I happen to be, because
for many years I programmed IBM mainframes.
Philip
--
Philip Hazel, University of Cambridge Computing Service.
