Author: Peter Bowyer Date: To: Exim users mailing list Subject: Re: [exim] Limits on address expansion
On 14/02/07, Marc Haber <mh+exim-users@???> wrote: > On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 15:52:47 +0000 (GMT), Philip Hazel
> <ph10@???> wrote:
> >On Wed, 14 Feb 2007, Marc Haber wrote:
> >> How does the concurrent delivery to remote hosts take place?
> >
> >The delivery process forks more than one subprocess. See section 1.13 in
> >the manual ("Delivery in detail").
>
> I see. IMO, the default is way too low, makes exim look bad when
> compared with postfix.
With respect, Exim looking good when compared with Postfix should not
be an objective. Being good with respect to its own design principles
should.
