--On 9 February 2007 09:40:47 +0000 Philip Hazel <ph10@???>
wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Peter Bowyer wrote:
>
>> > exim-dev.
>>
>> Possibly, but this is bigger than 'dev'. I'd hope we could get
>> knowledgable, experienced non-develpers into the discussion. I believe
>> we need to get together a strong core project team and have robust
>> discussions on the future of the project -the 'what should the
>> architecture look like for Exim 5+' discussion can happen after.
>
> If you think of exim-dev as "discussion about the development" rather
> than "discussion by developers" then it suffices. However, I wouldn't
> object to a new, special-purpose list. But then, I don't really want my
> opinion(s) to affect any of this! :-)
It also works if you think of "developers" as inclusive of everyone
involved in the development process, including those with something to say
about functional requirements or design, as well as coders.
> --
> Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service
> Get the Exim 4 book: http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book
--
Ian Eiloart
IT Services, University of Sussex
