Re: [exim] [patch] "do nothing" ACL modifier

Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 February 2007 16:37, Philip Hazel wrote:
>> On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Renaud Allard wrote:
>>>> I think it'll be tricky to pick a single "verb" that will convey the
>>>> effect it has without potential confusion.
>> That is becoming quite clear!
>>
>> Given that this is a "condition", I suppose we could call it "true", but
>> then I suppose we would also need "false". Hmm. Maybe that would be
>> useful?
>>
>>> What about nullexpand ?
>> or "justexpand"
>
> I don't think it matters what it's called. Users will have to read the manual
> to find it anyway - it's not something you can simply guess.

Ha! That really did make my morning :) You know perfectly well that no
one reads the manual before posting some stupid question on here :P