------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
http://www.exim.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=458
------- Comment #11 from ph10@??? 2007-02-07 16:29 -------
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, holmgren@??? wrote:
> ------- Comment #10 from holmgren@??? 2007-02-07 15:45 -------
> On Wednesday 07 February 2007 16:31, ph10@??? wrote:
> > As far as I can see, it *does* always call parse_extract_address().
>
> It does? Where? When testing, I get:
>
> > ${if match_address {"Magnus Holmgren" <holmgren@???>}{*@lysator.liu.se}{yes}{no}}
Did I misunderstand? I though you were talking about ${address:
No, I didn't misunderstand. This is what you wrote:
Hmmm, would it hurt too much if ${address: ...} always called
parse_extract_address()? Obviously it causes a little bit of overhead
when it wasn't needed.
As far as match_address goes, I don't see why one would ever want to
supply a full RFC2822 address.
> I concur. address_list was that Kjetil T. Homme suggested. But isn't
> "addresslist" better, considering the "historical mis-design"?
I don't think I really mind, though "addresslist" is already an Exim
technical term, so might be misunderstood. I had considered something
like "regularize_address_list", but that's too long, and
"fix_address_list" is vague.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://www.exim.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
