On Wednesday 07 February 2007 16:37, Philip Hazel wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Renaud Allard wrote:
> > > I think it'll be tricky to pick a single "verb" that will convey the
> > > effect it has without potential confusion.
>
> That is becoming quite clear!
>
> Given that this is a "condition", I suppose we could call it "true", but
> then I suppose we would also need "false". Hmm. Maybe that would be
> useful?
>
> > What about nullexpand ?
>
> or "justexpand"
I don't think it matters what it's called. Users will have to read the manual
to find it anyway - it's not something you can simply guess.
--
Magnus Holmgren holmgren@???
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
"Exim is better at being younger, whereas sendmail is better for
Scrabble (50 point bonus for clearing your rack)" -- Dave Evans
