On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Renaud Allard wrote:
> > I think it'll be tricky to pick a single "verb" that will convey the
> > effect it has without potential confusion.
That is becoming quite clear!
Given that this is a "condition", I suppose we could call it "true", but
then I suppose we would also need "false". Hmm. Maybe that would be
useful?
> What about nullexpand ?
or "justexpand"
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service
Get the Exim 4 book: http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book