Lähettäjä: Dan_Mitton Päiväys: Vastaanottaja: Peter Bowyer Kopio: Exim users mailing list Aihe: Re: [exim] Experimental SPF spec...
>> >> It seems like it would only take a couple little "tweaks" of the code to >> implement a 'spf_helo' [I found out '-' doesn't work :( ] check that could >> work in the HELO ACL (I think I have something workable). This would at >> least give people the option. From what I'm seeing on the SPF discussion >> lists, it seems like checking at HELO is becoming more popular.
>
>Perhaps what's needed is an optional second argument to 'spf = xxxx',
>with the same syntax as 'spam = ' ...
>
>spf = xxxx : helo
>spf = xxxx : mfrom
>
>
>... preserving the existing behavior if the second argument is
>missing, of course.
>
That sounds like the perfect solution!! So the lines would look something
like:
spf = fail:softfail : helo
and
spf = fail:softfail : mfrom
Is it done yet? :D
>
>>
>> >I was wondering if I had time to look at using perl calls to the new
>> >Mail::SPF module to have a bit more of a play......
>> >
>>
>> I started with the perl Mail:SPF modules and had everything working, HELO >> included, but I was getting occasional problems connecting to the spfd. I >> know that I'm running on a very tiny machine and that might be the problem. >> That's why I started looking into the integrated libspf2 solution.
>>
>
>I agree, it probably should be supported. I just mocked up the
>Mail::SPF HELO check, seems to be functionally OK, but performance is
>a worry.
>
>Peter