Re: [exim-dev] [Bug 458] Expansion condition: forall and/or …

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Philip Hazel
Date:  
To: bug458
CC: exim-dev
Subject: Re: [exim-dev] [Bug 458] Expansion condition: forall and/or forany
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, holmgren@??? wrote:

> So I'm still trying to decide which is best: An expansion operator that
> converts from an RFC 2822 address-list to a list compatible with
> string_nextinlist(); separate conditions (foranyaddress/foralladdresses) that
> work with such lists; or perhaps string_nextinlist can simply ignore
> separators within quoted strings (treating \" as a literal quote).


The last of those is a bad idea because string_nextinlist is used all
over the place. I wouldn't want it to assume any kind of quoting other
than what it currently has.


-- 
Philip Hazel            University of Cambridge Computing Service
Get the Exim 4 book:    http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book