Re: [exim] exim 4.63 and spamassasin [solved]

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Magnus Holmgren
Date:  
To: exim-users
Subject: Re: [exim] exim 4.63 and spamassasin [solved]
On Sunday 04 February 2007 22:43, De Leeuw Guy wrote:
> On /etc/exim4/conf.d/acl/40_exim4-config_check_data
>
>   # warn
>   #   spam = Debian-exim:true
>   #   message = X-Spam_score: $spam_score\n\
>   #             X-Spam_score_int: $spam_score_int\n\
>   #             X-Spam_bar: $spam_bar\n\
>   #             X-Spam_report: $spam_report

>
> I uncomment the line that I need


In the original post you were talking about the sa-exim package, but the above
has nothing to do with that; it uses the built-in "spam" condition and
corresponding expansion variables (aka Exiscan). You have to choose which to
use - there is no point using both. See the README.Debian.gz file of the
sa-exim package for a comparison.

If you decide to use Exiscan you might want to change the report template into
something more suitable for putting in the mail header. In local.cf put:

clear_report_template
report _REPORT_

-- 
Magnus Holmgren        holmgren@???
                       (No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)


"Exim is better at being younger, whereas sendmail is better for
Scrabble (50 point bonus for clearing your rack)" -- Dave Evans