Re: [exim] Anyone using SRS ??

Etusivu
Poista viesti
Vastaa
Lähettäjä: Dan_Mitton
Päiväys:  
Vastaanottaja: W B Hacker
Kopio: exim users
Aihe: Re: [exim] Anyone using SRS ??
> > Yes, that is exactly the problem. I might have an answer...
> >
> > forwarding_router:
> >   driver = redirect
> >   srs = forward
> >   data = $local_part@$domain
> >   srs_condition = \
> >     ${if and \
> >       { \
> >         {!eq{$sender_address}{}} \
> >         {match_ip{$sender_host_address}{+relay_from_hosts}} \
> >         {!match_domain{$sender_address_domain}{+relay_to_domains}} \
> >       } \
> >     }

> >
> > What I think I'm trying to say with the above code is:
> >
> > IF sender in not <> AND
>
> > sender is someone I'd normally relay for AND
> > sender's domain is a domain I don't relay for
>
> Do these seem to be in conflict?
>
> i.e. - if the sender's domain is not one you relay fpr, how do you know

the
> sender is (one you relay for?) - or 'recognize' said sender.
>


Isn't the $sender_host_address the IP address of the sending server? I
should be able to know that this came from my internal network (the
servers I relay for). If I'm missing something here, please let me know.

> > THEN I'm not really acting as a relay, I'm acting more as a forwarder,

so
> > SRS the thing.
> >
> > Does that make any sense?
>
> *snip*
>
>
> Question;
>
> - Will the $local_part and/or $domain necessarily even have been

preserved?
> (presuming the notes server has instigated the forwarding...or used an

alias)
>


What is happening is 2 divisions of the same company (in this case, the
government) div_a.company.com & div_b.company.com each with their own
independent mail systems. Bill Jones transfers from div_a to div_b and is
now named William Jones, but they want mail addressed to his old
Bill.Jones@div_a.company.com address to get forwarded to
William.Jones@div_b.company.com. The edge Exim server doesn't know
anything about anyone. Exim just passes the Bill.Jones@div_a.company.com
mail along to Notes. Notes decides that Bill's mail should be forwarded
to William.Jones@div_b.company.com and hands a new message (from Exim's
point of view) back to Exim. Because the original "MAIL FROM:" has been
preserved, if the original sender has SPF records defined, when div_b gets
it message, it will flag it as not having come from the original sender
(because I forwarded it). If div_a can SRS the message before it gets
forwarded, that (should, I hope) make div_b's SPF happy. So, I'm hoping
that the Exim code would work something like - the message came form a
server I relay (my Notes server) and the original senders domain (which
might be anything) is not a domain I relay for, so SRS it. If the
original sender IS a domain I relay for, I don't need to SRS, because I am
the original sender. Sorry for the long story.

> Or do you need some way to build a list/DB of 'who gets..(SRS applied)'.
> And if so, might not that solve the problem 'up front'?
>
> i.e. - is there perhaps some way to scan for (the equivalent of) active

.forward
> files and/or aliases- then pre-load them into a list/Db for Exim - prior

to
> encountering traffic?
>


Yes, If I can't generalize a solution, this might be the way to go. But
then I will have extract jobs and parsing and load jobs. I'd like to
avoid that if possible.

> IF you can query the Notes server - or whatever DB drives it - at all...


Exim on one side of a firewall, Notes on the other, no access (other then
SMTP) allowed.

>
> IF NOT - your Exim may remain at least partially 'blind' to external

events -
> regardless of logical tests.
>


What sort of external events?

> Wonder if the Notes server could do the necessary?
>


It likely could, but this seems an easier place (not for technical
reasons) to implement.

> JM2CW
>
> Bill