On Thursday 01 February 2007 13:09, Philip Hazel wrote:
> A thought: as I wrote this, it occurred to me that maybe there is a way
> that Exim can take note of having obeyed "delay", and if so, force out
> its output buffer after it has written the next response, instead of
> waiting until it has run out of input. If possible, that would solve
> this issue automatically. Any views on this idea?
Would it cause trouble if Exim flushed its output as soon as it encounters
a "delay" modifier?
--
Magnus Holmgren holmgren@???
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
"Exim is better at being younger, whereas sendmail is better for
Scrabble (50 point bonus for clearing your rack)" -- Dave Evans
