------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
http://www.exim.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=457
------- Comment #2 from holmgren@??? 2007-01-31 11:59 -------
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 11:12, ph10@??? wrote:
> > The semantics described in sections 10.9
> > through 10.17 should work, at least when the item being checked is an IP
> > address.
>
> So use match_ip!
But match_ip only accepts IP addresses/networks in the list, and I can't
understand why the same matching as with the hosts ACL condition can't be
used here, but with an arbitrary address to check.
> > What have I missed? Even if it's not entirely clear how to specify
> > cleanly how this test should work, it should be possible to decide on a
> > sufficiently meaningful specification.
>
> That's the point. I felt that it was indeed not clear how to specify this
> cleanly.
Can you elaborate? Do you have any examples of particularly dirty situations?
Should a domain name that resolves to multiple IP addresses have to have
*all* those IP addresses match the host list?
--
Configure bugmail:
http://www.exim.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
