On Wednesday 24 January 2007 13:32, Marc Haber wrote:
> to fix a bug reported against exim4's Debian packages, I need the
> patch that was applied against exim to implement change PH/18 in exim
> 4.64.
>
> Can somebody with access to development CVS please pull this change
> and post it? Thanks in advance!
I think this should be it.
--
Magnus Holmgren holmgren@???
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
"Exim is better at being younger, whereas sendmail is better for
Scrabble (50 point bonus for clearing your rack)" -- Dave Evans
Index: exim-src/src/parse.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/exim/exim-src/src/parse.c,v
retrieving revision 1.9
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10
--- exim-src/src/parse.c 8 Mar 2006 11:13:07 -0000 1.9
+++ exim-src/src/parse.c 10 Oct 2006 15:36:50 -0000 1.10
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* $Cambridge: exim/exim-src/src/parse.c,v 1.9 2006/03/08 11:13:07 ph10 Exp $ */
+/* $Cambridge: exim/exim-src/src/parse.c,v 1.10 2006/10/10 15:36:50 ph10 Exp $ */
/*************************************************
* Exim - an Internet mail transport agent *
@@ -597,10 +597,15 @@
TRUE and parse_found_group is FALSE when this function is called, an address
which is the start of a group (i.e. preceded by a phrase and a colon) is
recognized; the phrase is ignored and the flag parse_found_group is set. If
-this flag is TRUE at the end of an address, then if an extraneous semicolon is
-found, it is ignored and the flag is cleared. This logic is used only when
-scanning through addresses in headers, either to fulfil the -t option or for
-rewriting or checking header syntax.
+this flag is TRUE at the end of an address, and if an extraneous semicolon is
+found, it is ignored and the flag is cleared.
+
+This logic is used only when scanning through addresses in headers, either to
+fulfil the -t option, or for rewriting, or for checking header syntax. Because
+the group "state" has to be remembered between multiple calls of this function,
+the variables parse_{allow,found}_group are global. It is important to ensure
+that they are reset to FALSE at the end of scanning a header's list of
+addresses.
Arguments:
mailbox points to the RFC822 mailbox
Index: exim-src/src/receive.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/exim/exim-src/src/receive.c,v
retrieving revision 1.29
retrieving revision 1.30
diff -u -r1.29 -r1.30
--- exim-src/src/receive.c 25 Sep 2006 10:14:20 -0000 1.29
+++ exim-src/src/receive.c 10 Oct 2006 15:36:50 -0000 1.30
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* $Cambridge: exim/exim-src/src/receive.c,v 1.29 2006/09/25 10:14:20 ph10 Exp $ */
+/* $Cambridge: exim/exim-src/src/receive.c,v 1.30 2006/10/10 15:36:50 ph10 Exp $ */
/*************************************************
* Exim - an Internet mail transport agent *
@@ -2051,8 +2051,6 @@
recipients_count = recipients_list_max = 0;
}
- parse_allow_group = TRUE; /* Allow address group syntax */
-
/* Now scan the headers */
for (h = header_list->next; h != NULL; h = h->next)
@@ -2063,6 +2061,8 @@
uschar *s = Ustrchr(h->text, ':') + 1;
while (isspace(*s)) s++;
+ parse_allow_group = TRUE; /* Allow address group syntax */
+
while (*s != 0)
{
uschar *ss = parse_find_address_end(s, FALSE);
@@ -2127,7 +2127,10 @@
s = ss + (*ss? 1:0);
while (isspace(*s)) s++;
- }
+ } /* Next address */
+
+ parse_allow_group = FALSE; /* Reset group syntax flags */
+ parse_found_group = FALSE;
/* If this was the bcc: header, mark it "old", which means it
will be kept on the spool, but not transmitted as part of the
@@ -2137,8 +2140,6 @@
} /* For appropriate header line */
} /* For each header line */
- parse_allow_group = FALSE; /* Reset group syntax flags */
- parse_found_group = FALSE;
}
/* Now build the unique message id. This has changed several times over the
Index: exim-src/src/sieve.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/exim/exim-src/src/sieve.c,v
retrieving revision 1.22
retrieving revision 1.23
diff -u -r1.22 -r1.23
--- exim-src/src/sieve.c 5 Sep 2006 14:05:43 -0000 1.22
+++ exim-src/src/sieve.c 10 Oct 2006 15:36:50 -0000 1.23
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* $Cambridge: exim/exim-src/src/sieve.c,v 1.22 2006/09/05 14:05:43 ph10 Exp $ */
+/* $Cambridge: exim/exim-src/src/sieve.c,v 1.23 2006/10/10 15:36:50 ph10 Exp $ */
/*************************************************
* Exim - an Internet mail transport agent *
@@ -1826,6 +1826,8 @@
if (saveend == 0) break;
header_value = end_addr + 1;
}
+ parse_allow_group = FALSE;
+ parse_found_group = FALSE;
}
}
return 1;
Index: exim-src/src/verify.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/exim/exim-src/src/verify.c,v
retrieving revision 1.42
retrieving revision 1.43
diff -u -r1.42 -r1.43
--- exim-src/src/verify.c 9 Oct 2006 14:36:25 -0000 1.42
+++ exim-src/src/verify.c 10 Oct 2006 15:36:50 -0000 1.43
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* $Cambridge: exim/exim-src/src/verify.c,v 1.42 2006/10/09 14:36:25 ph10 Exp $ */
+/* $Cambridge: exim/exim-src/src/verify.c,v 1.43 2006/10/10 15:36:50 ph10 Exp $ */
/*************************************************
* Exim - an Internet mail transport agent *
@@ -1451,8 +1451,9 @@
{
header_line *h;
uschar *colon, *s;
+int yield = OK;
-for (h = header_list; h != NULL; h = h->next)
+for (h = header_list; h != NULL && yield == OK; h = h->next)
{
if (h->type != htype_from &&
h->type != htype_reply_to &&
@@ -1466,9 +1467,10 @@
s = colon + 1;
while (isspace(*s)) s++;
- parse_allow_group = TRUE; /* Allow group syntax */
+ /* Loop for multiple addresses in the header, enabling group syntax. Note
+ that we have to reset this after the header has been scanned. */
- /* Loop for multiple addresses in the header */
+ parse_allow_group = TRUE;
while (*s != 0)
{
@@ -1478,7 +1480,7 @@
int start, end, domain;
/* Temporarily terminate the string at this point, and extract the
- operative address within. */
+ operative address within, allowing group syntax. */
*ss = 0;
recipient = parse_extract_address(s,&errmess,&start,&end,&domain,FALSE);
@@ -1534,7 +1536,8 @@
string_sprintf("%s: failing address in \"%.*s:\" header %s: %.*s",
errmess, tt - h->text, h->text, verb, len, s));
- return FAIL;
+ yield = FAIL;
+ break; /* Out of address loop */
}
/* Advance to the next address */
@@ -1542,9 +1545,12 @@
s = ss + (terminator? 1:0);
while (isspace(*s)) s++;
} /* Next address */
- } /* Next header */
-return OK;
+ parse_allow_group = FALSE;
+ parse_found_group = FALSE;
+ } /* Next header unless yield has been set FALSE */
+
+return yield;
}
@@ -1587,9 +1593,10 @@
s = colon + 1;
while (isspace(*s)) s++;
- parse_allow_group = TRUE; /* Allow group syntax */
+ /* Loop for multiple addresses in the header, enabling group syntax. Note
+ that we have to reset this after the header has been scanned. */
- /* Loop for multiple addresses in the header */
+ parse_allow_group = TRUE;
while (*s != 0)
{
@@ -1599,7 +1606,7 @@
int start, end, domain;
/* Temporarily terminate the string at this point, and extract the
- operative address within. */
+ operative address within, allowing group syntax. */
*ss = 0;
recipient = parse_extract_address(s,&errmess,&start,&end,&domain,FALSE);
@@ -1623,6 +1630,9 @@
s = ss + (terminator? 1:0);
while (isspace(*s)) s++;
} /* Next address */
+
+ parse_allow_group = FALSE;
+ parse_found_group = FALSE;
} /* Next header (if found is false) */
if (!found) return FAIL;
@@ -1705,13 +1715,14 @@
uschar *pm_mailfrom, int options, int *verrno)
{
static int header_types[] = { htype_sender, htype_reply_to, htype_from };
+BOOL done = FALSE;
int yield = FAIL;
int i;
-for (i = 0; i < 3; i++)
+for (i = 0; i < 3 && !done; i++)
{
header_line *h;
- for (h = header_list; h != NULL; h = h->next)
+ for (h = header_list; h != NULL && !done; h = h->next)
{
int terminator, new_ok;
uschar *s, *ss, *endname;
@@ -1719,6 +1730,11 @@
if (h->type != header_types[i]) continue;
s = endname = Ustrchr(h->text, ':') + 1;
+ /* Scan the addresses in the header, enabling group syntax. Note that we
+ have to reset this after the header has been scanned. */
+
+ parse_allow_group = TRUE;
+
while (*s != 0)
{
address_item *vaddr;
@@ -1761,11 +1777,21 @@
else
{
int start, end, domain;
- uschar *address = parse_extract_address(s, log_msgptr, &start,
- &end, &domain, FALSE);
+ uschar *address = parse_extract_address(s, log_msgptr, &start, &end,
+ &domain, FALSE);
*ss = terminator;
+ /* If we found an empty address, just carry on with the next one, but
+ kill the message. */
+
+ if (address == NULL && Ustrcmp(*log_msgptr, "empty address") == 0)
+ {
+ *log_msgptr = NULL;
+ s = ss;
+ continue;
+ }
+
/* If verification failed because of a syntax error, fail this
function, and ensure that the failing address gets added to the error
message. */
@@ -1773,14 +1799,13 @@
if (address == NULL)
{
new_ok = FAIL;
- if (*log_msgptr != NULL)
- {
- while (ss > s && isspace(ss[-1])) ss--;
- *log_msgptr = string_sprintf("syntax error in '%.*s' header when "
- "scanning for sender: %s in \"%.*s\"",
- endname - h->text, h->text, *log_msgptr, ss - s, s);
- return FAIL;
- }
+ while (ss > s && isspace(ss[-1])) ss--;
+ *log_msgptr = string_sprintf("syntax error in '%.*s' header when "
+ "scanning for sender: %s in \"%.*s\"",
+ endname - h->text, h->text, *log_msgptr, ss - s, s);
+ yield = FAIL;
+ done = TRUE;
+ break;
}
/* Else go ahead with the sender verification. But it isn't *the*
@@ -1814,15 +1839,24 @@
/* Success or defer */
- if (new_ok == OK) return OK;
+ if (new_ok == OK)
+ {
+ yield = OK;
+ done = TRUE;
+ break;
+ }
+
if (new_ok == DEFER) yield = DEFER;
/* Move on to any more addresses in the header */
s = ss;
- }
- }
- }
+ } /* Next address */
+
+ parse_allow_group = FALSE;
+ parse_found_group = FALSE;
+ } /* Next header, unless done */
+ } /* Next header type unless done */
if (yield == FAIL && *log_msgptr == NULL)
*log_msgptr = US"there is no valid sender in any header line";
