Re: [exim] Punishing malformed HELO at acl_smtp_rcpt level?

Mike Meredith wrote:
> Sometime around Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:00:54 -0500, it may be that Wakko
> Warner wrote:
> > I did this on a test machine as well. If you ever do exim -bh and
> > don't provide an IP and port number (via -oMi I believe), the
> > $interface_port is -1
>
> Yes I kept getting caught by that ... there's now a postit note glued
> to the bottom of my monitor to remind me of -oMi. Oddly -bh allows you
> to specify a port, but doesn't seem to set $interface_port; undoubtedly
> for a good reason.

The port is the port that would have been used on the sender's side.

--
Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals
Got Gas???