Re: [exim-dev] Old topic again: Option to avoid fsync()?

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Florian Weimer
Date:  
To: Matt Bernstein
CC: Michael Haardt, exim-dev
Subject: Re: [exim-dev] Old topic again: Option to avoid fsync()?
* Matt Bernstein:

> I try to avoid r/w contention by using full data journalling with external
> journals, which are on physically different (and hopefully faster) HDDs. I
> believe this is good practice for synchronous I/O like mail and NFS.


If you want to throw money at the problem, a RAID controller with a
battery-backed cache is a good option as well.

On the other hand, with a lot drives in their default configuration,
fsync() can't reliably do what it claims to anyway. 8-/