Re: [exim] SpamHaus PBL

On Sun, 2007-01-07 at 21:52 +0000, Peter Bowyer wrote:
> On 07/01/07, Kjetil Torgrim Homme <kjetilho@???> wrote:
> > what's the point? these providers should block port 25 instead. the
> > providers who don't care to block that port, won't bother to register
> > their networks in PBL either.
>
> Not true - very many already have. I've promoted zen.spamhaus.org
> above my other DNSBLs and its not letting a lot through. I check
> dynablock.njabl.org and dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net later in that order; njabl
> is getting very few hits now.

okay, perhaps it makes sense, but their claim that it is Policy Based is
not true. I was surprised to find one of our C-nets in the PBL, this
was certainly not added by us, and our terms of use do not prohibit the
use of port 25.

--
Kjetil T.