Hello Sander,
Sander Smeenk <ssmeenk@???> (Sa 06 Jan 2007 01:33:03 CET):
> Quoting Heiko Schlittermann (hs@???):
>
> > what I understand from SRS is:
> > If I use SRS for outgoing messages, bounces to messages I sent should be
> > addressed to SRS-"encoded" recipients, not to real real recipients.
>
....
> A DSN originates from a null sender to stop loops, normal email should
> (again in my honest opinion) never be sent from a null sender address.
> So i drop every DSN to addresses that are 'protected' by SRS and that
> doesn't meet my SRS policy.
>
> > Who is wrong here? Should SORBS use valid non-null sender addresses or
> > should I forget thinking about SRS?
>
> I'd say SORBS.
Thank you :)
> > [ In case SORBS is wrong - does anybody here know some folks from SORBS
> > to ask for a fix? ]
>
> Better would be to implement a whitelist in your SRS-check, like i did.
> You'll find it hard to convince people to change their setup because you
> have a problem.
Yes, we're always fixing our servers to cope with problems of others :-(
Best regards from Dresden
Viele Grüße aus Dresden
Heiko Schlittermann
--
SCHLITTERMANN.de ---------------------------- internet & unix support -
Heiko Schlittermann HS12-RIPE -----------------------------------------
gnupg encrypted messages are welcome - key ID: 48D0359B ---------------
gnupg fingerprint: 3061 CFBF 2D88 F034 E8D2 7E92 EE4E AC98 48D0 359B -
