Autor: Peter Bowyer Data: Para: Exim, Users Asunto: Re: [exim] OT(?): SRS vs. SORBS sending mails with '<>' sender
On 05/01/07, Renaud Allard <renaud@???> wrote: > Peter Bowyer wrote:
> > On 05/01/07, Renaud Allard <renaud@???> wrote:
> >> If you'd ask for a personal advise, SORBS is nothing to be trusted as a
> >> blacklist.
> >
> > They have 17 different lists. Is this broad-brush 'advice' to be
> > applied to all 17?
> >
>
> Unfortunately, yes. :(
You've used them all, and experienced FPs? What about dul?
> I am sorry to tell that, but is you use sorbs as a first line of defense
> and reject with 5xx on this only, be prepared to reject a bunch of
> legitimate mails.
> I prefer to use them on a basis like "if you are listed on sorbs spam
> and the callout doesn't verify, and you are attaching an image, just
> forget about sending me mail". So they are useful, no doubt about this,
> but just cannot be trusted.
What's you're evidence for this? Broken down by the 17 separate lists.
