--On 3 January 2007 14:28:11 +0000 Mike Cardwell
<exim-users@???> wrote:
> * on the Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 02:20:23PM +0000, Ian Eiloart wrote:
>
>>>>> I was just using port 2000 in the example, it's not how I actually
>>>>> have my systems configured. Anyway, it should be 465 for
>>>>> tls_on_connect, not 587. :)
>>>> While I'm being all pedantic...
>>>> http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/DontObfuscate
>>> I think you're taking the obfuscation rules a bit to the extreme there.
>>> There's a difference between obfuscating, and using an example. I wasn't
>>> taking real "log extracts, configuration snippets, and error messages"
>>> and then munging them before posting...
>> But, you did lead me to waste my time addressing the wrong problem.
>
>> From my perspective you wasted your time addressing the wrong problem
> because you didn't read my post properly. I don't feel at fault. Anyway,
> I have my answers now. Thanks for everyones assistance.
I read your post properly. You said that your server was listening on port
2000, and I wasted my time addressing that problem. I didn't think hard
about what kind of TLS you were talking about, and got that wrong, but I'd
have thought twice if you'd given the correct port. Please don't obfuscate.
> Mike
--
Ian Eiloart
IT Services, University of Sussex
