On Friday 15 December 2006 10:39, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
> my own stupidity or unability to read/understand the documentation? (exim
> 4.63)
>
> spamd_address = ssl.schlittermann.de 783
>
> failed with 'network unreachable' (in the exim log) when exim tried to
> connect the spamd server.
>
> spamd_address = 212.80.235.130 783
>
> works.
As I can't see any name resolution code in spam.c, your intelligence is
probably fine.
> The error message is somewhat confusing. And: I didn't understand from
> the spec, that it has to be an *IP address*... And I do not see if this
> option gets expanded (because I'd like to use a dnsdb lookup to get the
> IP address).
No, sorry, AFAICS it's not expanded either. Please file a wishlist bug with
Bugzilla.
--
Magnus Holmgren holmgren@???
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
"Exim is better at being younger, whereas sendmail is better for
Scrabble (50 point bonus for clearing your rack)" -- Dave Evans
