Re: [exim] Match if previous router matched

Quoting Jörg Sommer:

> Ehm, my question was not if I should use unseen. I want to know if it's
> possible to match a router upon the previous or another router matched.
> Or how else I can prevent duplicating of the rules if I need two
> transports.

A combination of unseen and address_data (set in the first router,
checked in the second) could probably do it. That may depend on the
conditions you use, so you should give a little more information.