On Thursday 30 November 2006 16:48, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 03:22:32PM -0000, ROGERS Richard wrote:
> > >> May I ask why you decided to use sa-exim instead of exim's built-in
> > >> content scanning interface?
> > >
> > > Well, you can but I cannot answer, as I don't know :)
> >
> > We (and others, I think) use it because it allows use of SpamAssassin's
> > report_safe option, which I don't think the built-in facility allows
> > (correct me if I'm wrong - that's how it seemed in testing earlier in
> > the year). This is a good option when you use an Outlook client (maybe
> > others?) as the spam content is not straight in your preview pane.
>
> Actually, report_safe doesn't really work even with SA-Exim, because
> it doesn't seem to be able to modify message body. I thought it was able,
> but lately it seems that it's not :/
It should be able, but you have to set SARewriteBody: 1 in sa-exim.conf. How
doesn't it work?
--
Magnus Holmgren holmgren@???
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
