Marc Perkel wrote:
> Yes - I was asking on behalf of someone else who was concerned if there
> had been any history of Exim security holes. I searched Google and there
> was one back in 1997, but didn't see any since. My answer is that Exim
> is as secure if not more so tan Qmail.
Which is a nonsense statement without qualification.
If an exim install is accidentally configured to be an open relay, but a
qmail install isn't, which is more secure?
Your question last time, and this time, lack enough context to be
meaningful.
--
Martin A. Brooks | http://www.antibodymx.net/ | Anti-spam & anti-virus
Consultant | e: martin@??? | filtering. Inoculate
antibodymx.net | m: +447896578023 | your mail system.
