Re: [exim] Fedora Extras sa-exim

On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 08:10:47AM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-11-18 at 16:08 +0000, Miles Sabin wrote:
> > I noticed that you've disabled sa-exim in recent Exim spec files. I know
> > that sa-exim has mostly been superceded by exim ACLs, but there's one
> > feature which I don't think can easily be replicated: the ability to
> > use SpamAssassin's report_safe option to have spam delivered as an
> > attachment with the report as the primary message body.
> >
> > Would you consider reinstating sa-exim? Or can you point me to somewhere
> > documenting how to get the same effect with exim ACLs (which doesn't
> > involve passing spam through SA twice or me having to write security-
> > critical transport filter scripts)?
>
> I'm not entirely averse to reinstating sa-exim if it can still do things
> that Exim alone cannot. It should be fairly easy for you to build it
> yourself still, too -- it's only one #define in the specfile.

sa-exim can also be built in a separate package independent of the
mail exim build. Would you like to split it that way? I've done that
for ATrpms and I could provide the neccessary specfile patches.
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net