Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
> Wakko Warner <wakko@???> (Fr 24 Nov 2006 02:41:13 CET):
> > Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
> > > But in transports and routers you can remove headers. And probably in
> > > the system filter (but then the mail already passed the ACL, didn't
> > > it?).
> >
> > Good, I'm glad I wasn't missing anything. It would be nice to beable to do
> > this. I was trying to setup something at work to change the importance of a
> > message and an ACL was the first thought. Unfortunately, add_headers just
> > adds new ones. MUAs that will be receiving this is outlook 2000. I didn't
> > test which ones it uses first. I suppose I could always have it added after
> > received.
>
> Here is some blueprint how you could try it:
>
> ...
> warn
> add_header = X-SECRET-Importance: 4711
>
>
> And later in the transport (I'm using the amavis transport here, because
> all incoming messages have to pass it):
>
>
> amavis:
> driver = ...
> headers_remove = Importance
> headers_add = Importance: $h_x-secret-importance
I did not want to have to do it that way. The setup I have, depending on if
the user is local or in sql, or if they have a .procmailrc or not, depends
on which router handles it and which transport handles it. That sounds like
I'd have to dupicate it 4 times.
--
Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals
Got Gas???
