Re: [exim] MAX_INCLUDE_SIZE

Tom Kistner wrote:
> John Robinson wrote:
>
>> I just mean that using lsearch, a linear search on an unordered plain
>> text file, is algorithmically inefficient, since it will always work
>> its way painstakingly through your 2M file, and on average inspect 1M
>> of it!
>
> You are right but thats not his use case :) The file in question is the
> list of target addresses, it isn't searched.
>
> /tom
>

One does wonder, OTOH, about list maintenance?

grep, awk, sed-inplace? Or?

Bill