Re: [exim] MAX_INCLUDE_SIZE

John Robinson wrote:

> I just mean that using lsearch, a linear search on an unordered plain
> text file, is algorithmically inefficient, since it will always work its
> way painstakingly through your 2M file, and on average inspect 1M of it!

You are right but thats not his use case :) The file in question is the
list of target addresses, it isn't searched.

/tom