On Thursday 16 November 2006 15:38, Dave Lugo wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Nov 2006, Philip Hazel wrote:
> > > This doesn't work real well for spammers or other b0rken MTAs that
> > > don't gracefully end the SMTP session. Are there any plans for
> > > an `acl_smtp_left_in_a_huff` or similar?
> >
> > Not that I know of.
>
> Um, could it be added to the wishlist?
I don't think anyone is gonna stop you. :-) There's already a wish for an
acl_sync_error.
http://www.exim.org/bugzilla/
--
Magnus Holmgren holmgren@???
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)