Re: [exim] DynaStop - It works for me.

--On 7 November 2006 15:15:56 +0000 Chris Lightfoot <chris@???>
wrote:

>
>> And further, if the spam goes into the recipient mailbox, then the
>> recipient receives the spam. So there is no point bothering running a
>> spam filter at all as all spams go where spammers want them to go.
>
> how do you allow the recipient to discover when mail they
> wanted has been blocked?

You don't. You allow the sender to discover when it's been blocked. After
all, email is sent because the sender wants to tell the recipient
something, not because the recipient wants it.

In the other case, where the recipient has asked for an email to be sent,
they'll know it's missing because it isn't in their mailbox.

How do you inform the sender? Well, you reject the email at SMTP time. If
the sender is using an RFC compliant email system, they'll get a
notification (if they want it). If they're not, then they're probably a
spammer.

--
Ian Eiloart
IT Services, University of Sussex