Re: [exim] Forbid HELO

On Thursday 26 October 2006 01:57, W B Hacker wrote:
> and, of course, the 'general case' - that of using, instead of port 25,
> port 24 - which was set aside for that purpose [1] long ago - so as to
> segregate such traffic from the 'rest of' the smtp arrivals.

s/24/587/.

--
SeattleServer.com Mailing Lists - Casey Allen Shobe
lists@??? - http://seattleserver.com