[exim] Re(2): truncated messages with mailman

*snip*

>and see what happens. I'm still bothered, though, by the original message
>about ALL messages being truncated at 47K.

Is that consistent across more than one submitting MUA?

ISTR a time when some MUA broke all attachments over a certain size into
multiple 'chunks'.

A Mailing List Mangler might no longer expect to have to deal with that.

Bill