Re: [exim] Exim has a bad queue handling?

On 10/23/06 2:09 AM, "Martin A. Brooks" <martin@???> wrote:

> It'd be interesting to see if there was an advantage to having your mail
> spool on reiserfs, and more interesting to see if that performance gain
> (if any) would be worth the usually risk of reiserfs lunching itself and
> it's been prone to do in the past.

reiserfs would probably help, but only until it falls over under load and
renders Exim's queue unrecoverable.

--John (who fears reiserfs)