On Thu, 19 Oct 2006, SeattleServer.com wrote:
> > Is there a way to have exim call spamassassin with the user to whom
> > the e-mail is sent?
>
> Not unless your defer after every recipient in the RCPT ACL so that exim sees
> a new copy of the message (and thus a new instance of the DATA ACL) for each
> recipient. I really doubt you want that.
>
I currently do just that on a handful of vanity domains. In a low-volume
situation, it works perfectly fine.
>
> Run it through SA in the data ACL regardless. Add a header to the message if
> you want and/or set an ACL variable with the result. Then decide whether to
> accept or reject or filter it per-recipient in the router or whatever exim
> hands the mail off to (maildrop, for instance). You can use the ACL variable
> in the routers.
>
(I've been thinking of that as well, as the next project on my hobby
stuff)
Another way to do it...
I've been considering accepting multiple rcpt_to, and setting up
some sort of recursive loop in the DATA acl to churn through each
rcpt's SA prefs.
. If all the recipients' configs say 'accept', it's 250'd.
. If all the recipients' configs say 'reject', it's 5xx'd.
. If some of the recipients' configs say 'reject', 5xx it,
AND give a detailed rejection message along the lines of:
(adjust as needed for multiline responses)
550 One or more recipient addresses were unable to accept
this message.
REJECTED: user@???, joe@???
ACCEPTED: frank@???
My possibly flawed thinking runs along the lines of:
. real mailing lists use VERP, and don't do multiple rcpt_to
. stuff to multiple rcpts like this usually person-to-person,
and they might notice the rejection
Has anyone tried something like this?
--
--------------------------------------------------------
Dave Lugo dlugo@??? LC Unit #260 TINLC
Have you hugged your firewall today? No spam, thanks.
--------------------------------------------------------
Are you the police? . . . . No ma'am, we're sysadmins.
