Re: [exim] problem of understanding of unseen, self=pass and…

Startseite
Nachricht löschen
Nachricht beantworten
Autor: Magnus Holmgren
Datum:  
To: exim-users
Betreff: Re: [exim] problem of understanding of unseen, self=pass and more
On Wednesday 18 October 2006 14:00, Stuart Gall took the opportunity to say:
> You would only need to install an exact copy of all the routers which
> have unseen set.
> Remove the unseen line
> change the transport to redirect
> add
> allow_balckhole
> data = :blackhole:
>


Or, if you don't want to keep the conditions matching, and at least one of the
routers is a redirect router, you can add the same address back to the
redirection data:

data = ${lookup whatever}, ${quote_local_part:
$local_part_prefix$local_part$local_part_suffix}@$domain

(Sorry, but I think that's the only way to be sure.)

You also set address_data to something that you use in the condition of that
extra router, instead of copying the actual condition(s). Exim makes sure
that there are no infinite loops by not letting the same router handle the
same address twice.

I don't know if this is less ugly. A "seen_but_continue" option, as suggested,
would be helpful.

-- 
Magnus Holmgren        holmgren@???
                       (No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)