Author: Ian Eiloart Date: To: W B Hacker, exim users Subject: Re: [exim] conducive.org
--On 18 October 2006 22:06:40 +0800 W B Hacker <wbh@???> wrote:
> Stuart Gall wrote:
>
>> Hello
>> Is the random callout negative reply cached so that in future
>> callouts only the sender is checked ?
The docs don't say.
>> Which cache ?
>>
>> Stuart.
>>
>
> Dunno what you mean. Wrong thread maybe?
The "random" callout is a callout using Exim's "random" parameter. That's
what generates addresses like
gandalf.llorien.org-1159383911-testing@???
Which is what this thread is about.
> We don't do callouts in particular or 'random' anything in general ...
> unless Bushmill's malt is involved...
>
> Bill
