Re: [exim] UCEPROTECT Blacklists and why callouts are abusiv…

Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
M\the complete thread tree sorted by date
MMAndrew - Supernews at <-
.MStuart Gall at ->
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Renaud Allard
Date:  
To: exim-users
Subject: Re: [exim] UCEPROTECT Blacklists and why callouts are abusive


Andrew - Supernews wrote:

>
> (I say "perceived" because I am skeptical about the proportion of spam
> that actually fails callout verification.)
>

The proportion of spam that actually fails callout verification varies
from 10% to 99.99% during peaks...
This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
Exim-users
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-Re: [exim] conducive.orgRe: [exim] UCEPROTECT Blacklists and why callouts are abusive->
Tahini and Hummus and Cumin Development Archives administrated by cumin AdminsLurker (version 2.3)