>>>>> "Ian" == Ian Eiloart <iane@???> writes:
Ian> 3. People using sender verification callouts. They seem to think
Ian> it's as bad as sending email,
>> Because ultimately it is.
Ian> So, if I stopped doing callouts, and chose to bounce spam
Ian> instead, that wouldn't be a backward step?
False dichotomy. You're not being forced to do either.
Ian> You'd be no more unhappy for me to fill your mailboxes with
Ian> bounced spam than you are about my callouts?
If, for example, I were using BATV, how would I be able to tell the
difference?
Since there's no benefit to you in bouncing spam, whereas there _is_ a
claimed benefit in doing callouts, that means that if the practice of
doing callouts goes unchallenged and unpunished, I can expect to see
_more_ connections in the long term as a result of callouts (and C/R)
than as the result of bounced spam.
--
Andrew, Supernews
http://www.supernews.com
