Auteur: Renaud Allard Date: À: W B Hacker CC: exim users Sujet: Re: [exim] conducive.org
W B Hacker wrote:
>
> Our error messages *might not* be specific if the nature of our tests turned up
> things that classified the source as a probable spammer or 'probe'.
>
> Your specific server had been so classified here 27 September 2006 for sending
> to a non-existent address that was clearly intentionally 'constructed', not a
> mis-spelling of a valid user.
You probably mean generated by a rule like that
!verify = sender/callout=20s,defer_ok,random
